How do users of a mental health app conceptualise digital therapeutic alliance? A qualitative study using the framework approach | BMC Public Health
Bond RR, Mulvenna MD, Potts C, O’Neill S, Ennis E, Torous J. Digital transformation of mental health services. NPJ Ment Health Res. 2023;2(1):13.
Google Scholar
Torous J, Bucci S, Bell IH, Kessing LV, Faurholt-Jepsen M, Whelan P, Carvalho AF, Keshavan M, Linardon J, Firth J. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(3):318–35.
Google Scholar
Linardon J, Torous J, Firth J, Cuijpers P, Messer M, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. Current evidence on the efficacy of mental health smartphone apps for symptoms of depression and anxiety. A meta-analysis of 176 randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry. 2024;23(1):139–49.
Google Scholar
Baumel A, Muench F, Edan S, Kane JM. Objective user engagement with mental health apps: systematic search and panel-based usage analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(9):e14567.
Google Scholar
Linardon J, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. Attrition and adherence in smartphone-delivered interventions for mental health problems: a systematic and meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020;88(1):1–13.
Google Scholar
Baumel A, Kane JM. Examining predictors of real-world user engagement with self-guided eHealth interventions: analysis of mobile apps and websites using a novel dataset. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(12):e11491.
Google Scholar
Flückiger C, Del Re AC, Wampold BE, Horvath AO. The alliance in adult psychotherapy: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy. 2018;55(4):316–40.
Google Scholar
Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Symonds D. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychother. 2011;48(1):9–16.
Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract. 1979;16(3):252–60.
Beatty C, Malik T, Meheli S, Sinha C. Evaluating the therapeutic alliance with a free-text CBT conversational agent (Wysa): a mixed-methods study. Front Digit Health. 2022;4:847991.
Google Scholar
Berry K, Salter A, Morris R, James S, Bucci S. Assessing therapeutic alliance in the context of mHealth interventions for mental health problems: development of the Mobile Agnew Relationship Measure (mARM) questionnaire. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(4):e90.
Google Scholar
Goldberg SB, Baldwin SA, Riordan KM, Torous J, Dahl CJ, Davidson RJ, Hirshberg MJ. Alliance with an unguided smartphone app: validation of the digital working alliance inventory. Assessment. 2022;29(6):1331–45.
Google Scholar
Tong F, Lederman R, D’Alfonso S, Berry K, Bucci S. Conceptualizing the digital therapeutic alliance in the context of fully automated mental health apps: a thematic analysis. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023;30(5):998–1012.
Google Scholar
Shrepp M. User Experience questionnaire handbook: all you need to know to apply the UEQ successfully in your projects (version 11). 2023.
Idrees AR, Kraft R, Pryss R, Reichert M, Baumeister H. Literature-based requirements analysis review of persuasive systems design for mental health applications. Procedia Comput Sci. 2021;191:143–50.
Tong F, Lederman R, D’Alfonso S, Berry K, Bucci S. Digital therapeutic alliance with fully automated mental health smartphone apps: a narrative review. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:819623.
Google Scholar
Darcy A, Daniels J, Salinger D, Wicks P, Robinson A. Evidence of human-level bonds established with a digital conversational agent: cross-sectional, retrospective observational study. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(5):e27868.
Google Scholar
Scherer S, Alder J, Gaab J, Berger T, Ihde K, Urech C. Patient satisfaction and psychological well-being after internet-based cognitive behavioral stress management (IB-CBSM) for women with preterm labor: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2016;80:37–43.
Google Scholar
Gómez Penedo JM, Coyne AE, Constantino MJ, Krieger T, Hayes AM, Grosse Holtforth M. Theory-specific patient change processes and mechanisms in different cognitive therapies for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020;88(8):774–85.
Google Scholar
Tremain H, McEnery C, Fletcher K, Murray G. The therapeutic alliance in digital mental health interventions for serious mental illnesses: narrative review. JMIR Ment Health. 2020;7(8):e17204.
Google Scholar
Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M. Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model and system features. In: Howlett M, Mukherjee I, editors. Routledge handbook of policy design. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2018.
D’Alfonso S, Lederman R, Bucci S, Berry K. The digital therapeutic alliance and human-computer interaction. JMIR Ment Health. 2020;7(12):e21895.
Google Scholar
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.
Google Scholar
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245.
Google Scholar
Yiend J, Taher R, Fialho C, Hampshire C, Hsu C-W, Kabir T, Keppens J, McGuire P, Mouchlianitis E, Peters E, et al. Assessing the efficacy and safety of STOP (successful treatment for paranoia)—an app-based cognitive bias modification therapy for paranoia: a randomised clinical trial protocol. Trials. 2024;25(1):806.
Google Scholar
Leung CJ, Fosuaah A, Frerichs J, Heslin M, Kabir T, Lee TMC, McGuire P, Meek C, Mouchlianitis E, Nath AS, et al. A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):225.
Google Scholar
Yiend J, Lam CLM, Schmidt N, Crane B, Heslin M, Kabir T, McGuire P, Meek C, Mouchlianitis E, Peters E, et al. Cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): a randomised controlled feasibility study in patients with distressing paranoid beliefs. Psychol Med. 2023;53(10):4614–26.
Google Scholar
Markowitz JC. Supportive evidence: brief supportive psychotherapy as active control and clinical intervention. Am J Psychother. 2022;75(3):122–8.
Google Scholar
Torous J, Firth J. The digital placebo effect: mobile mental health meets clinical psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(2):100–2.
Google Scholar
Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41.
Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114523.
Google Scholar
Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):148.
Google Scholar
Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. 1st ed. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019. p. 843–60.
Fletcher AJ. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(2):181–94.
Willig C. Perspectives on the epistemological bases for qualitative research. In: APA handbook of research methods in psychology: foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics, vol 1. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2023. p. 5–22.
Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. edn. New York: Routledge; 1994.
Biagianti B, Quraishi SH, Schlosser DA. Potential benefits of incorporating peer-to-peer interactions into digital interventions for psychotic disorders: a systematic review. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(4):377–88.
Google Scholar
Greenwood KE, Gurnani M, Ward T, Vogel E, Vella C, McGourty A, Robertson S, Sacadura C, Hardy A, Rus-Calafell M, et al. The service user experience of SlowMo therapy: a co-produced thematic analysis of service users’ subjective experience. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract. 2022;95(3):680–700.
Dosovitsky G, Bunge EL. Bonding with bot: user feedback on a chatbot for social isolation. Front Digit Health. 2021;3:735053.
Google Scholar
Li J, Zhang C, Li X, Zhang C. Patients’ emotional bonding with MHealth apps: an attachment perspective on patients’ use of MHealth applications. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;51:102054.
Venning A, Herd MCE, Oswald TK, Razmi S, Glover F, Hawke T, Quartermain V, Redpath P. Exploring the acceptability of a digital mental health platform incorporating a virtual coach: the good, the bad, and the opportunities. Health Inform J. 2021;27(1):1460458221994873.
Gromann PM, Heslenfeld DJ, Fett A-K, Joyce DW, Shergill SS, Krabbendam L. Trust versus paranoia: abnormal response to social reward in psychotic illness. Brain. 2013;136(6):1968–75.
Google Scholar
Wintersteen MB, Mensinger JL, Diamond GS. Do gender and racial differences between patient and therapist affect therapeutic alliance and treatment retention in adolescents? Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2005;36(4):400–8.
Chao PJ, Steffen JJ, Heiby EM. The effects of working alliance and client-clinician ethnic match on recovery status. Community Ment Health J. 2012;48(1):91–7.
Google Scholar
Prochaska JJ, Vogel EA, Chieng A, Kendra M, Baiocchi M, Pajarito S, Robinson A. A therapeutic relational agent for reducing problematic substance use (Woebot): development and usability study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e24850.
Google Scholar
Latham GP, Locke EA, Fassina NE. The high performance cycle: standing the test of time. In: Psychological management of individual performance. edn. 2002. p. 199–228.
Clarke J, Proudfoot J, Whitton A, Birch M-R, Boyd M, Parker G, Manicavasagar V, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Fogarty A. Therapeutic alliance with a fully automated mobile phone and web-based intervention: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2016;3(1):e10.
Google Scholar
Hoffman L, Wisniewski H, Hays R, Henson P, Vaidyam A, Hendel V, Keshavan M, Torous J. Digital opportunities for outcomes in recovery services (DOORS): a pragmatic hands-on group approach toward increasing digital health and smartphone competencies, autonomy, relatedness, and alliance for those with serious mental illness. J Psychiatr Pract. 2020;26(2):80.
Google Scholar
Linhorst DM. A history of powerlessness. In: Linhorst DM, editor. Empowering people with severe mental illness: a practical guide. edn. New York: Oxford Academic; 2005. p. 12–39.
Rogers C. Client-centered therapy. In: Arieti S, editor. American handbook of psychiatry, vol. 3. New York: Basic Books; 1966. p. 183–200.
Aref-Adib G, O’Hanlon P, Fullarton K, Morant N, Sommerlad A, Johnson S, Osborn D. A qualitative study of online mental health information seeking behaviour by those with psychosis. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):232.
Google Scholar
Bucci S, Morris R, Berry K, Berry N, Haddock G, Barrowclough C, Lewis S, Edge D. Early psychosis service user views on digital technology: qualitative analysis. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(4):e10091.
Google Scholar
Noble H, Smith J. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18(2):34.
Google Scholar
Lindheim T. Participant validation: a strategy to strengthen the trustworthiness of your study and address ethical concerns. In: Espedal G, JelstadLøvaas B, Sirris S, Wæraas A, editors. Researching values: methodological approaches for understanding values work in organisations and leadership. edn. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 225–39.
link
